Externalization within BDSM
Written by: Mistress Moriah
Why draining Dominants is not surrender, but a psychological mechanism
Within BDSM, there is often talk of power, and surrender. Less often mentioned is what happens psychologically when desires are not acted upon, but are placed on the other person. Yet it is precisely this mechanism that is a major cause of exhaustion among Dominants. It has a name: externalization.
Externalization is a well-described psychological process that becomes particularly visible in intimate power dynamics. BDSM not only increases pleasure and connection, but also unconscious patterns. This makes it a powerful but also demanding context.
What exactly is externalization?
Externalization means that someone places inner needs, tensions, or desires outside of themselves and unconsciously expects someone else to resolve them. The emotion or desire is real, but the responsibility is shifted.
Instead of:
“I feel this desire and want to explore how I deal with it.”
The following arises:
“I feel this desire, you can give this to me, so you must do this.”
That difference seems subtle, but it is fundamental. In the first case, there is self-reflection and attunement. In the second case, the other person becomes a means of satisfying an inner need.
Why BDSM reinforces externalization
BDSM works with explicit roles, power, and consent. That makes it a context in which externalization quickly becomes visible. A Dominant has experience, self-knowledge and often emotional stability. For someone who struggles with recognition, emptiness, or tension, that can feel like a solution.
This is where a dangerous misinterpretation arises:
Because you can handle this, you should handle this.
But psychologically speaking, that is not correct. Someone’s ability does not mean obligation. And desire does not create entitlement.
Recognizable examples from practice
Example 1: the wish list without a relationship
A sub sends an extensive list of desires, without any interest in who you are, what you want, or where your boundaries lie. The underlying message is not curiosity, but expectation.
Not:
“Could this be something that fits between us?”
But implicitly:
“This is what I need, you are Dominant, so arrange this.”
Here, your role is reduced to a function. That is externalization.
Example 2: the “but you can do this” argument
A sub desires a certain experience and says:
“But you can do this, you are experienced.”
This sounds like a compliment, but psychologically it is a shift of responsibility. Your skill is used as an argument for why you should give something, regardless of your desire, energy, or context.
Example 3: Findom without a relationship
Financial dominance can be a clear and consensual power dynamic. But when someone demands money without agreement because “that’s just how Findom works,” the relationship disappears completely.
Psychologically speaking, this is not dominance, but externalization of one’s own insecurity, emptiness, or need for control.
Why this exhausts someone
People do not become exhausted from power or responsibility. They become exhausted from emotional claims without reciprocity.
When a Dominant is structurally approached as:
- a solver of deficiencies
- a supplier of confirmation
- a regulator of emotions
- a fulfiller of unprocessed desires
emotional overload occurs. In psychological terms: the Dominant is used as an external emotion regulator, sometimes referred to within the scene as a “fetish (or kink) dispenser.”
This is unsustainable. Not only because it is draining, but because it does not bring growth. Not for the sub and not for the Dominant.
Psychological safety as a touchstone
Psychological safety means that both parties can be themselves without fear of being drained or used. Within BDSM, this means:
- that no means no
- that desires can be discussed without coercion
- that roles are not a justification for emotional strain
- that responsibility remains with the source
As soon as a Dominant feels responsible for the inner well-being of the other, psychological safety disappears.
The social context: entitlement as a breeding ground
The rise of externalization within BDSM is not unrelated to society. In a culture where attention, visibility, and affirmation feel scarce, the idea that one is entitled to them grows. Social media reinforces this pattern. Desire becomes public property. Boundaries are experienced as rejection. BDSM is sometimes seen as a shortcut to fulfillment.
But BDSM is not a compensation mechanism for unfulfilled needs. It is a relational dynamic that requires maturity.
What healthy BDSM does require
Healthy BDSM requires that people:
- recognize their desires as their own
- take responsibility for their inner state
- approach the other as a human being, not as a means to an end
- understand that power is not a service
- be willing to endure disappointment
That is maturity.
A possible reinforcing factor: fast-paced stimulus culture and dopamine
Although externalization is a well-known psychological mechanism that has existed for a long time, it seems to be more visible and frequent in the present day. Various insights from neuropsychology and behavioral sciences indicate that modern stimulus culture may play a reinforcing role in this.
Social media, and in particular short-form content such as reels and short videos, are designed around quick rewards, novelty, and immediate responses. This form of media consumption strongly and repeatedly activates the dopamine system. Dopamine is not a happiness hormone, but a substance involved in expectation, motivation, and the pursuit of reward.
Quick stimuli
Research links prolonged exposure to quick stimuli with lower frustration tolerance and difficulty with delayed gratification. This puts pressure on the ability to tolerate inner tension, allow desires to exist without immediate fulfillment, and regulate emotions independently.
Within BDSM, this mechanism can become particularly visible. Whereas desire used to be explored, built up, and attuned to, there is now sometimes an expectation that intensity and fulfillment must be readily available. BDSM is then unconsciously approached as a direct solution to inner tension, rather than as a relational dynamic that requires time, attunement, and responsibility.
Reinforcement
This does not mean that social media causes externalization, but it does mean that it can reinforce existing patterns. In a context where immediate gratification becomes the norm, responsibility shifts more easily to the outside. The idea that someone else, and in particular a Dominant, should resolve inner turmoil becomes psychologically more understandable, but not healthier.
Precisely because BDSM works with power, attention, and surrender, this shift becomes visible more quickly than in many other relationships. This requires extra awareness, both on the part of people who desire and on the part of Dominants who set boundaries.
It is precisely by recognizing and naming this mechanism that BDSM can once again become what it essentially is:
an encounter between two people who see each other without draining each other.
The role of AI in today’s stimulus culture
In addition to social media, the rise of artificial intelligence may also play a reinforcing role in the increase in externalizing behavior. Conversational AI offers immediate response, constant availability, and substantive confirmation, without the reciprocity, boundaries, and friction that characterize human relationships. Neuropsychologically, this activates reward mechanisms similar to those triggered by human contact, while at the same time reducing the practice of self-regulation and frustration tolerance.
In a context such as BDSM, where desire, power, and attention are central, this shift can contribute to an expectation of immediate fulfillment and a shift of inner responsibility to the other person. This makes conscious use and reflection all the more important.
Mistress Moriah
More information
Meer inspirerende blogs van Meesteres Moriah
